Romance and cool stuff
Nov. 29th, 2005 06:22 pmAfter reading
green_knight's Theory of Everything, Part I, I started thinking about some of the problem scenes from The Silver Bowl and what was missing from them. I've decided that the answer is "romance" ("romance" as in "cool stuff", not as in "girl meets boy"). To me, "romance" or "cool stuff" is in many ways the point of genre fiction. Cool ideas, cool settings, intriguing concepts. If it was all just plot and outcomes, then why not just read mainstream fiction? And even mainstream fiction, I think, has "cool stuff" of its own, it's just a different set of cool stuff.
There was "cool stuff" in the original version, but the plot and starting conditions needed to generate it failed the plausibility test. The newer version is much more plausible and logical, but it just seems... pointless. As the story became more realistic, I found I became less and less interested in it. There were still various reasons to keep reading, and I worked hard to keep the plot pacing up, but in the end it was turning into a story that I didn't particularly care about. I want silver bears and clay horses in my stories, as much as I want realism. I'm going to have to find a way now to get the romance back in there.
There was "cool stuff" in the original version, but the plot and starting conditions needed to generate it failed the plausibility test. The newer version is much more plausible and logical, but it just seems... pointless. As the story became more realistic, I found I became less and less interested in it. There were still various reasons to keep reading, and I worked hard to keep the plot pacing up, but in the end it was turning into a story that I didn't particularly care about. I want silver bears and clay horses in my stories, as much as I want realism. I'm going to have to find a way now to get the romance back in there.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 01:40 pm (UTC)What you're struggling with sounds more like the line between fantasy and fancy, as described by
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:26 pm (UTC)Oh well, better luck next draft, I guess.